Skip Navigation, or press ALT and K together and then press enter.Welcome to the OMC website. This site has been developed for both the visually impaired and non visually impaired. If you would like to use the visually impaired version of this site please go to, or press ALT and I together and then press enter

Irish Child Health Database - Peer Reviewed Papers

Database Search

You are here: Irish Child Health Database » Study Papers » Qualitative Studies » Study adopting an focus group approch
  • The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A useful screening tool to identify mental health strengths and needs in looked after children and inform care plans at looked after children reviews?: A focus group study of the views of social workers and their managers

    Published in:

    Child Care in Practice, Vol: 14, Page: 193-206,Taylor & Francis

    Publication Date:


    Aims & Objectives:

    The aim of this study was understand the views of social workers and their managers of using a "systematic assessment of the psychological and emotional needs of children on the edge"


    The mental health of Looked After Children is not routinely assessed either upon entering the care system or during their period in care. Many children only receive help when difficulties become entrenched and more intensive treatment is required. Often this occurs when placements are fragile or have broken down. The Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS) 2007 Consultation Paper "Care Matters in Northern Ireland--A Bridge to a Better Future" has recommended "systematic assessment of the psychological and emotional needs of children on the edge and LAC". Prior to the focus group study outlined below, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) screening was undertaken with a sample of Looked After Children (n = 76), 37 males and 39 females, in Home first Community Trust, aged 3-17 years (standard deviation = 4.3), living with relatives or foster carers. Confirmed Neglect was recorded as the primary reason for becoming looked after in 75% (n = 57) of the children screened. SDQ screening was undertaken with 76 (78%) carers, 64 (76%) teachers and 32 (87%) children aged 11+, and the findings provided to the child's social worker for consideration at the child's statutory review. Fifty-six per cent of carers, 39% of teachers and 30% of children identified significant difficulties, with 63% of carers, 35% of teachers and 45% of children stating that the difficulties had been present for over a year. Pre-test and post-test file audits were undertaken to ascertain whether SDQ screening had informed the child's care planning process. While care plans reflected an increase in referrals for further assessment and treatment in 42%, a number assessed with significant difficulties were not referred due to uncertainty about accessing appropriate services or concerns about swamping existing services. This paper outlines the findings of three focus groups with social workers and managers following SDQ screening of a sample of Looked After Children within four generic childcare teams and a team for children with special needs in Home first Community Trust. Participants reflected on the usefulness of the SDQ in identifying mental health strengths and difficulties to inform decision-making at Looked After Children Reviews. Participants recommended that routine SDQ screening is undertaken with all Looked After Children, with early intervention provided to children identified with some mental health difficulties and prioritisation of children with significant need. The usefulness of SDQ identification of child strengths as a foundation for promoting resilience in Looked After Children was also recognised. Recommendations were also made regarding specific service provision for Looked After Children and training for field social workers, link social workers and carers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved) (from the journal abstract)


    Stewart Whyte; Anne Campbell

    Study Type:

    Study Papers » Study adopting an focus group approch » Qualitative Studies


    1357-5279 Accession Number: 2008-05979-007. First Author & Affiliation: Whyte, Stewart; Northern Health and Social Care Trust, United Kingdom. Other Journal Title: Child Care in Practice. Release Date: 20081020. Publication Type: Journal, (0100) Peer Reviewed Journal, (0110). Media Covered: Print. Media Available: Electronic; Print. Document Type: Journal Article. Language: English. Major Descriptor: Child Care; Health Care Services; Health Screening; Mental Health; Social Workers. Minor Descriptor: Childhood Development; Management Personnel. Classification: Community & Social Services (3373) . Population: Human (10) Male (30) Female (40) . Location: Ireland. Age Group: Childhood (birth-12 yrs) (100) Preschool Age (2-5 yrs) (160) School Age (6-12 yrs) (180) Adolescence (13-17 yrs) (200) . Tests & Measures: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; . Methodology: Empirical Study; Qualitative Study. References Available: Y.


    psychological and emotional needs;

    International Classification:

    Focus groups - views of social workers using a "systematic assessment of the psychological and emotional needs of children on the edge"



    Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland)