Skip Navigation, or press ALT and K together and then press enter.Welcome to the OMC website. This site has been developed for both the visually impaired and non visually impaired. If you would like to use the visually impaired version of this site please go to omc.gov.ie/viewtxt.asp, or press ALT and I together and then press enter

Irish Child Health Database - Peer Reviewed Papers

Database Search


You are here: Irish Child Health Database » Study Papers » Qualitative Studies » Study adopting an focus group approch
  • European citizens' opinions on water fluoridation

    Published in:

    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, Vol: 36, Page: 95-102

    Publication Date:

    April 2008

    Aims & Objectives:

    The aim of this study was to understand European citizens' opinions on water fluoridation, as part of research on their attitudes to the tensions between private and public interest

    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVES: To understand European citizens' opinions on water fluoridation, as part of research on their attitudes to the tensions between private and public interest. METHODS: Sixty-eight focus groups held (with an average of eight people per group) in September and October 2003 in 16 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK). RESULTS: Most participants were against water fluoridation, although groups in Greece, Ireland, Poland and Sweden were more in favour. Many felt dental health was an issue to be dealt with at the level of the individual, rather than a solution to be imposed en masse. While people accepted that some children were not encouraged to brush their teeth, they proposed other solutions to addressing these needs rather than having a solution of unproved safety imposed on them by public health authorities whom they did not fully trust. They did not see why they should accept potential side effects in order that a minority may benefit. In particular, water was something that should be kept as pure as possible, even though it was recognized that it already contains many additives. CONCLUSIONS: While the vast majority of people opposed water fluoridation, this may be indicative of shifts away from public support of population interventions towards private interventions, as well as reduced trust in public agencies. Thus if research were to demonstrate more clear benefits of water fluoridation over and above that which can be achieved by use of fluoride toothpaste, then the public may become more supportive. However, lobby groups are likely to remain influential.

    Authors:

    M. Griffin; D. Shickle; N. Moran

    Study Type:

    Study Papers » Study adopting an focus group approch » Qualitative Studies

    Categories:

    water fluoridation

    International Classification:

    Focus groups - dental, water fluoridation

    Keywords:


    Geography:

    International (16 European counteries)